Nice and very professional, but I don't see the point in that. If I have my original conversion, I don't need an original background layer. Plus, storing those multi-layer files sucks up hard drive space in a hurry. Paul On Apr 11, 2007, at 8:40 AM, David Savage wrote:
> My edits are done as non-destructively as possible. The only things I > do to the original background layer (or more correctly a copy of) is > spotting dust, cloning in or out details as needed & sharpening. And > recently I haven't always been doing my sharpening to the background > layer (or it's copy). > > Everything else is done with adjustment layers. > > Cheers, > > Dave > > On 4/11/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I generally retouch in PS without adjustment layers. I almost always >> know exactly what I want to do, and if I change my mind, I simply >> flip back in the history. I'm not modifying the original, the RAW is >> still on file with all my adjustment parameters intact. For big >> retouching jobs, layers are great. For minor adjustment of >> photographs, they're unnecessary. >> Paul > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
