Because I work all day in the IT field and I'm loathe to write one single line of HTML code. I like photography, not more programming when I'm not working. Or call me lazy.
Someday I will likely have my own gallery, but until then photo.net works fine for easily and quickly displaying images. It's not ideal, but it's close enough for the time being. Tom C. >From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Web Hosting: PBase or Photo.net? >Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:56:28 -0700 > >Unless your ISP doesn't allow you any free space, I see no reason to used >Photonet or other such hosts. > >Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi > > > I've had an account on Photo.net forever, but I generally dislike > > their album/display tools. Same goes for most of the picture hosting > > commercial websites. > > > > That's why I build my own pages and lease my own web server, or > > use .Mac ... > > > > G > > > > On Apr 10, 2007, at 8:12 AM, Jay Taylor wrote: > > > > > My annual subscription is coming up > > > on PBase and I'm considering a > > > possible change of service. For those > > > of you who have used Photo.net, > > > how do you like it ? > > > I'm overall somewhat satisfied with > > > PBase, but sometimes find it gets > > > bogged down with slow uploading > > .> and some folks don't seem to be able > > > to view links back to my photos. > > > The upload feature of selecting a > > > single .zip files of multiple > > > pictures is nice as well as the Style Sheets > > > and galleries functions. > > > I'd like to find out more about Photo.net > > > though. I have a limited > > > account already, but wonder how the paid > > > service compares to PBase > > > and some of the others. > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
