I guess you deleted the original. Jan van Wijk wrote: > Hi Bruce, thanks for the feedback! > > On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:51:17 -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote: > > >> I like Soaring Stork. I am curious, though - on my screen it looks >> too contrasty - almost like detail is being lost in the whites and >> blacks. >> > > Yes, it is a bit harsh. Contrast was quite high in the sunlight :-) > > > >> Can you show another version that isn't quite so punchy? >> Trying to show the feathers along the neck and back more? >> > > Yes, I went back to the RAW conversion (CS2) and noticed that > allthough there where no real 'blown highlights', reducing the > exposure a bit distributes the whites a bit better giving a more > pleasing image, with a bit more detail in the whites ... > > Thanks for making me take a second stab at that. > Corrected image is at: > > http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=228 > > and the original still at: > > http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=226 > > Regards, JvW > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery > > > >
-- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
