No that's not why. It's a matter of numbers, quite obviously. Paul On Apr 6, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Tom C wrote:
> Hmmm... is that why Yahoo groups has a Nikon DSLR Astro group (553 > members) > and 4 different Canon DSLR Astro groups (largest with 1373 > members), but > not one for Pentax? > > Astrophotography is a an area where low noise is super important. > > > > Tom C. > > > > >> From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Wow. ISO 6400 images on the MKIII >> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:26:54 -0400 >> >> Thats what i was getting at. >> >> LOL >> >> I think Pentax does a good job with higher end noise, Nikon has some >> learnin' to do. >> >> Dave >> >> On 4/6/07, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Maybe Cotty can give you some pointers. <g,d & r> >>> >>> -- >>> Scott Loveless >>> www.twosixteen.com >>> >>> >>> >>> P. J. Alling wrote: >>>> But it still won't do the one thing my *ist-D or a K10d will do. >> Accept >>>> unmodified Pentax lenses. >>>> >>>> David J Brooks wrote: >>>> >>>>> http://www.flickr.com/groups/canondslr/discuss/72157600044980101/ >>>>> >>>>> WARNING, CANON IMAGES. >>>>> >>>>> Saw this on another list, and had a look. >>>>> >>>>> I know its hard to tell on the web and all, but they sure look >>>>> good. >>>>> >>>>> My D2H at iso 400 look worse than these. >>>>> >>>>> Dave >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >> >> >> -- >> Equine Photography >> www.caughtinmotion.com >> http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ >> Ontario Canada >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
