Here's a page of specifications: http://www.floatograph.com/645v.html
It's bigger than a K10D by a healthy bit, but not so big as to be unmanageable for hand held shooting. Kind of a lot to carry around much, however. Godfrey On Mar 24, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > Hi, > > So, about what are the dimensions of the 645 and about how much > does it > weigh? How big is it compared to a K10D? > > I wish I had a pay grade for the 645D to be outside of <LOL> > > Shel > > >> [Original Message] >> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi >> >> I think we discussed this at some point in the past month. Based on >> Pentax releasing a new D-FA 55 mm lens, it looks like it will be a >> 1.2x crop on 645 format, which means the current lens range would >> need to be extended by one more wide to achieve the same maximum FoV >> as the Pentax 645 35mm lens provided. >> >> I still have the loaner 645 system ... Really should get out and >> shoot with it some more. >> >> - Overall, the 645D body looks about as bulky as the Pentax 645/645N/ >> 645NII bodies do. >> >> - Pentax has always put both bottom and side tripod mounts on the 645 >> model. This is great: I fit adapter plates for the tripod and swap >> between vertical and horizontal without ever having to flip the >> tripod head over. >> >> I like the 645 a lot. I fear the price of the 645D body might be out >> of my pay grade, but I have it in my sights as my next digital camera >> upgrade for whenever it might appear... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
