Damn that's an ugly dog... O:-) Henk Terhell wrote: > Shel, do I qualify for reply? If so, I can tell you that I like this > lens a lot and I find it to be the perfect travel companion with the DA > 16-45. Also the compact size makes it a pleasure to use. For examples, > see on my website e.g. > > http://www.dewindvanvoorne.nl/fotoalbum/Australia/Marsupials%20(buideldi > eren)/slides/IMGP6100.html > > Henk > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff >> Sent: 14 March, 2007 5:10 PM >> To: PDML >> Subject: The DA 50~200 >> >> >> Is the 50-200 supposed to be a "consumer" zoom - i.e., >> designed more to a price point than the highest quality >> image? For those who use the lens, are you pleased with it. >> Paul, and a few others, seem to be quite happy with theirs, >> but what about those of you who don't often comment on such things? >> >> >> Shel >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> > > >
-- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
