Yes. SSM compatibility for the 100 and 110 makes a lot of sense. It complements the DA* lens intro. You can bet that there won't be an incompatible small-format DSLR introduced for many a moon -- if ever. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Adam Maas wrote: > > >John Francis wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:47:19PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote: > >>>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=21896693 > >>> To present new DSLR's" at PMA seems very optimistic. How about > >>> "announce" new DSLR's? I expect the K1D (or whatever it ends up being > >>> called) to be announced some time this year, but "presented", even > >>> under glass? I'd be very surprised. I'd love to be wrong, though... > >> > >> I suspect it's more likely to be a mis-translation, and Pentax will > >> be showcasing the K10D - that is, after all, a 'new' DSLR - and will > >> pre-announce a K1D (far more likely if the 654D is to be delayed). > >> But we'll know for certain in a few meeks (PMA is March 8th-11th). > > > >Actually, I wouldn't be shocked for a replacement K100D and K110D to be > >announced as well. Probably changes will be SSM compatibility and > >(hopefully) bigger buffers to remain competetive with the D40. > > Hey, I'd forgotten that the K100 and K100 weren't compatible with the > SSM lenses. That's a very logical upgrade and probably not too > difficult a feature to add. Good call, Adam. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
