Hi!

> He has been offered a demo FA* for near exactly the same amount as the Ltd.
> What he wants a fast short telephoto for is mainly to shoot his nephews. He
> has a Sigma 70-200/2,8 but his experience is that AF is to slow, and off
> course it back focuses. He was also talking about using it in a medium
> weight trekking kit. 
> 
> We found the FA* to focus faster than the Sigma. He is also planning to buy
> a K10, so AF speed will probably be all right. And that is one reason he was
> leaning towards the FA*, because the seller had told him the Ltd has way
> slower AF performance. Can someone confirm this? 
> 
> Another reason for preferring FA* was that he found the Ltd more a piece of
> jewellery. He expected he would feel a bit uncomfortable with using it
> outdoor under rough conditions. I can sympathise with this. The built of the
> FA* begs for real life use. 
> 
> He asked me if I felt the FA* to be a close range lens. Any comments on
> this? 
> 
> So basically I'm asking for advise for a sympatric Pentax guy. Take it away
> Sam...

I have 77 Ltd (as you know) and I only *saw* FA* 85/1.4, never touched 
one. Well, I did touch the FrankenCam with FrankenLens attached, thanks 
to Cotty, but I think it was A* 85/1.4. I've been taking my 77 Ltd to 
various places and it is still doing very well ;-). I must say that FA* 
looks and A* feels very big.

I vote for 77.

Boris


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to