Godfrey, thanks for the response - > It's a judgement call, for sure, but based on my experience in RAW > conversion processing and subsequent, I know pretty much what I need > to get the results in my final print. :-)
Works for me, its the way I try to operate also. Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: K10D - exposure consistency, bracketing > I'm judging the exposure accuracy based on both how the picture looks > to my eye and by the histogram display in Camera Raw together. On > scenes which approach the general case of an average 18% reflectance > gray, I expect the histogram display to be approximate to a Gaussian > distibution. I also look to see whether what I consider to be Zone II > to Zone IX areas of the scene are windowed in the histogram without > clipping. > > It's a judgement call, for sure, but based on my experience in RAW > conversion processing and subsequent, I know pretty much what I need > to get the results in my final print. :-) > > Godfrey > > > On Dec 14, 2006, at 9:10 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote: > >> Great info Godfrey, thanks for sharing. >> >> Curious as to how you judged accuracy exposure wise? >> >>> About 20 of the 25 scenes exposed with the K10D today were right on >>> the money exposure-wise at 0EV compensation. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
