Does the AF500FTZ not have an Auto-Thyristor mode? I know the AF400FTZ and AF540FGZ do. Auto flash works extremely well on digital.
-Adam Tom C wrote: > It's not an argument at all. I'm simply stating that since I paid, at the > time, a pretty penny, and haven't used it that much, I'm disappointed. > > Why would I shoot film just to use my flash unit? > > > Tom C. > > > >>From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>Subject: Re: RE: K10D and Ring flash >>Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:49:25 +0000 (GMT) >> >>On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Tom C wrote: >> >> >>>Yeah I understand that technology changes... It doesn't help though that >> >>I >> >>>bought their most expensive flash unit and that now it's basically >> >>useless. >> >>>:-) Long before the life of the product itself has been exhausted. >> >>That's an aperture-simulator kind of argument. Stick it on an AF film >>body and enjoy. >> >>The real complaint is that we had to wait 14 years for the successor >>of the AF500FTZ (more if you live in the UK). The MZ-S would have made >>use of it as early as 2001. >> >>Kostas >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
