Yeah. Basically, I took a bunch of test shots with the terrain and the snow, and exposed for the snow to be almost blown out, but not quite. After that, everything was manual (K-lens, and all...)
-Cory On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Markus Maurer wrote: > Hi Cory > did you shoot with manual aperture *and* shutter speed measuring an average > before? > greetings > Markus > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Cory Papenfuss > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 12:30 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: Another Panorama PESO... > > > I did notice that, but I'm pretty sure it was due to side-lighting > on the lens causing some flare-ish stuff. All of the exposures and > processing were identical. > > I really didn't want to get into that level of "manual" tweaking. > Besides... the color skewing doesn't seem to be consistent. The dark > areas are slightly darker, but the sky seems slightly more yellow to me. > Since it's a limitation of my gear that I could do nothing about, I guess > I'm less concerned. Previous panos I've done have had vignetting due to > shooting with a wide aperture or other technical flaws that I *could* have > done something about. Those I'm much less excited about. > > -Cory > > On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Markus Maurer wrote: > >> But Cory, Im' I really the only one seing it beeing darker at the right > end? >> Before printing you should equalize the lightning or cut that part IMHO >> >> greetings >> Markus >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of >> Cory Papenfuss >> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 6:56 PM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: Another Panorama PESO... >> >> >> On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Gorgeous. Excellent work. I'd love to see a ten-foot long print. >>> Paul >> >> Thanks... that's why I've been trying to finish it up... to make >> prints for the family. The ones I'm giving away I printed at 8"x52" at >> 466 dpi. >> >> What's the commonly accepted "minimum" resolution for a personal >> print like that? For some reason, 150 dpi comes to mind... that'd be >> almost 20 feet long at that. Yikes! >> >> -Cory >> >> > > -- > > ************************************************************************* > * Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA * > * Electrical Engineering * > * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * > ************************************************************************* > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- ************************************************************************* * Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA * * Electrical Engineering * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************************************* -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
