> > From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/12/12 Tue PM 11:46:55 GMT > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Request for photos > > In that case it was an e-mail that took over two weeks to reach my inbox, > because I just received it Sunday night. > > I went back and looked at the headers and it was sent Sunday November 26. > > Oh well, it show hows unprofessional the whole thing might have been. I was > being given less than 24 hours notice before she needed to have the material > completed.
I wonder how long she had tried to make the "free" version acceptable? 8-)) > > >From: mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >Subject: Re: Request for photos > >Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:22:26 +0000 > > > >Tom C wrote: > > > > > I figure she made a typo somewhere. > > > > > > > >>>>I need to finish editing by Monday 27th at 7am (CE time), and > >delivery of printed material for investors must be 7.12.2006. > > > >Guess what day 27th of November was? > > > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >[email protected] > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
