> Fra: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 12/12/06, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you have three sensors, and they have, the difference between two > > sensors with the same orientation but positioned on opposite sides of the > > frame they will be able to measure rotation. It is not very clear from the > > document, but at least it is possible and I know this has been mentioned > > other places as well. > > It actually says: > > "Based on a free-floating sensor design, PENTAX SR is superior to > other sensor-moving systems because it uses no guide rails, allowing > the sensor to oscillate in three directions?horizontally, vertically, > and rotationally." > > But in this later document which includes references to the K10D: > > http://www.pentaxslr.com/files/scms_docs//PENTAX_SR_Description_091506.pdf > > "Based on a free-floating sensor design, PENTAX SR is superior to > other sensor-moving systems because it uses no guide rails, allowing > the sensor to oscillate in three directions?horizontally, vertically, > and diagonally." > > So it's clear as mud.
Have you tried to explain rotation as a third dimension to marketing people .-) That may explain some of the confusion. To me it makes more sense than the third direction is a rotation than just a diagonal translation. The latter would be possible with the right design of guide rails, but not the rotation. DagT -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
