well there you go, these guys tested both MF and LF lenses and they have the LF lenses not as good in general and the best LF not as good as best MF. So where is their 35mm lens tests? I cant find any. But even without them how can you expain away the differences between MF and LF and what makes you think that the best 35mm wouldnt be even better if tested by them exactly the same way? I really only see one or two outstanding MF lense listed here even if their testing methods match methods used by others regarding Pentax 35mm lenses. Most listed are worse than most pentax 35mm lens results I have seen and that further proves my contention that MF lenses in general are not as sharp as 35mm lenses...( and similarly LF lenses are not as good as MF lenses in general in terms of resolution). jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 11:50 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?) ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?) >I dont have any medium format lens tests in my bookmarks > but I saved this one a while back: > > http://www.hevanet.com/cperez/testing.html Try: http://www.hevanet.com/cperez/MF_testing.html Which brings us back to medium format resolution comparisons, which was the topic of discussion: "> On 12/10/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> MF lenses in general do not achive the >> same resolution as 35mm lenses" > This is the same link you ignored earlier, you can ignore it again if you like. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
