So what you're saying is you need at least a 133x card for real
continuos shooting ?

On 12/8/06, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patrick,
> I did some tests with a high speed card, don't remember if it was 150x
> or what.  Jpegs were continueous - no buffer overflow.  Otherwise, it
> was 7-9 shots before things slowed to about 1 shot per second.  DNG
> were ~16 meg each but faster than PEF at 9-12 meg each.  By that, I
> mean you got 9 DNG's before slowdown vs only ~7 PEF's... at least
> that's what I remember.
> Somebody here suggested that DNG was faster as the PEF's required some
> processing (compression) before writing to the card.
> YMMV.
> Regards, Bob S.
>
>
> On 12/8/06, Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has anyone done any real life tests on the buffer speed of theK10D ?
> >
> > I'm wondering what is the "real life" card speed required to acheive
> > the 9 frames in raw mode capability.
> >
> > Do you get more frames in PEF than in DNG ?
> > How about JPEG + DNG or Jpeg + PEF ?
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
Regards

Patrick Genovese

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to