It's bigger than a 5D, smaller than a 1Ds. -Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote: > I think the 645D smaller than the Canon full-frame DSLRs. I used only > 6x7 for quite a while. Took it everywhere. > Paul > On Dec 7, 2006, at 7:51 AM, David Savage wrote: > >> On 12/7/06, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On 07/12/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> I'd prefer a 13-14+ MP 35mm "full frame" DSLR. >>> The standard reply generally is: 645 is the new full frame camera! ;-) >> Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument. How many here, in the past >> (or are currently) lugged around a Pentax 645 on their daily walk, to >> work etc for their day to day shooting? >> >>> But hey yeah, I'm with you, and chuck in an aperture feedback sensor >>> too, $3k would have me handing over the cash. No way I'll hand over >>> $10K+ for a 645D. >> Ditto. >> >> Dave >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
