On second thought, you're right. I could just crop out froggy and friends. Will do. Paul On Dec 4, 2006, at 10:17 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Thanks Ann. Good point. I could probably paint out the toys in the > background, but it's just a snapshot and probably not worth the time. > Anyway, I'm feeling lazy these days:-). > Paul > On Dec 4, 2006, at 10:16 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > >> I particularly like the second one -- maybe crop out blurry froggie >> in back? >> >> ann >> >> Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >>> Both are ISO 800 with the K10 and the FA 50/1.4. The first is f4 @ >>> 1/45th. The second is f2 @ 1/125th. Probably could have shot at ISO >>> 400 here. Rendered on my laptop, so I'm not absolutely sure about >>> the >>> levels. >>> Paul >>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5288004 >>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5287990 >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
