Oh? My whole system cost less than $200. Sounds great to me, difinately as good or better than 99% of the systems I have heard. OTOH, my hearing is only good from 25c to 13Kc these days, and I don't have many rich friends.
-graywolf J. C. O'Connell wrote: > Once you spend about $1000 or more on a phono > rig or a CD rig, the phono rig will whoop the > CDS ass.....CD only gets so good as you go > up the scale, while analog just gets better and > better as you spend spend spend money money money > on the gear....It takes a high end playback > system to allow the LP superiority to be heard > too, one that most people not only do not have, > most people have never even heard in theire entire > life. > > P.S. MP3 Popularity has nothing > to do with sound quality, it has to do with > cost and portability, and a lot of people still > swap MP3s for free..... > > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > graywolf > Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 9:44 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Pink Floyd, etc. > > > That is debatable. My ears can not tell the difference either way. Both > are definitely better than mp3, however guess which is the most popular? > > J. C. O'Connell wrote: >> That's funny, I have kept my 3000+ LP collection >> to listen to them ( although I do like the covers >> too ) because they definately sound better than CDs do >> with a good phono playback system.... > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
