Quoting Mark Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It took, what, about one week? Posters to the forum built up expectations > for the K10D to a fever pitch. Then the camera came out and the first > impressions were wonderful. Pentax was Golden. Soon, pixel-peepers pushing > the limits detected possible patterning in blue channel dark noise at 1600. > The naysayers came out of the woodwork! "It's horrible!" "Pentax will > never fix it" "It's unusable!"
I thought that was what we did.:-) > > One irrational poster actually returned his camera because *someone else* > reported a problem! Nutty, huh? Not really > > Anyway, I think the arc of happiness/unhappiness was quite predictable. > That kind of behavior has been a fixture on the Canon/Nikon forums for > years. In a way, it is a sign that Pentax has hit the big time with the > K10D. Whoo Hoo, we made it.:-). I'v given up on the4 Nikon forums. The Nikond1 BB has the most sane memebers, aand knowledgable. Similar the this list, with out all the Pentax gear..LOL > > Me? I'm sure the K10D is a super camera. I'll probably get it or its > successor at some point, but I like my *ist Ds (except for the name, of > course). I;m slowly moving that way myself. Dave > > --Mark > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > Equine Photography in York Region -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
