My NZ-S wireless was done on a somewhat limited basis and, for whatever reason, was free from failure. Possibly due to low area lighting.(?) It's an option I'll be quick to install if and when available.
Jack --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The 'wonderful' *istD does that too. I can tell you in practice that > it is hit and miss. I used to use it when doing fill flash during > daylight for weddings and portraits. Problems that I encountered > were > that sometimes it would not fire the main flash - it seemed to do > with > how bright it was outside - something like the popup wasn't powerful > enough to be seen. I finally quit trying to use it that way and just > went with the cords. No problems at all that direction and I haven't > gone back. For me, it is a none feature. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Saturday, December 2, 2006, 1:49:47 PM, you wrote: > > JD> Did someone mention, awhile back, that Pentax was considering a > program > JD> change to the K10D that would permit wireless flash operation > with > JD> either a 360 or 540 which would be triggered the on-board flash? > JD> Something like the wonderful MZ-S? > > JD> Jack > > > > > JD> > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > JD> Cheap talk? > JD> Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. > JD> http://voice.yahoo.com > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
