Paul, no offense or pun but I think that K 24/3.5, K 28/3.5 M 40/2.8 M 200/4 may safely be left behind. Each being a fine optic, but you have so much overlap in your kit...
Boris On 12/3/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These are now in my Pelican case.(Some should probably go to the > shelf:-): > DA 12-24/4 > DA 16-45/4 > K 24/3.5 > K28/3.5 > FA 35/2 > M40/2.8 > FA 50/1.4 > DA 50-/200 /4.5-5.6 > K 85/1.8 > Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5 macro > K 135/2.5 > M 200/4 > FA 80-310/4.5-5.6 > A 400/5.6 > On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:21 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > > My "essential" lens kit now is: > > > > DA14/2.8 > > FA20-35/4 > > DA21/3.2 > > FA35/2 > > FA50/1.4 > > FA77/1.8 > > FA135/2.8 > > > > I'm considering selling the FA77 for a DA70 (but the FA77 is very > > nice...), and will probably update the 35 and 50 to the new DA lenses > > when they appear. The only 'hole' in my lens kit now is a compact > > 28mm f/2 lens... I'd like a DA Limited for that. > > > > I much prefer the primes for their speed and size. > > > > Godfrey > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
