You might check into QuadToneRIP. Since it doesn't use the Epson driver, I believe it will print to an arbitrary length on roll paper. B&W only, though.
Godfrey On Dec 2, 2006, at 8:18 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > Yes, that's what I've found in my experiments this morning. I'm not > going to print it at 40 inches. It would be only 5.5 inches high. > Instead I'm cutting it into four pieces and making four 18 x 10.6 > prints. I'll mat and frame each one individually. Hung together, it > will still make a nice display. It's a wedding present for friends, so > I want it to be nice. It's a pic of the lake where they lived and fell > in love, a panorama of the entire shoreline. My friends are leaving > town now, so I want them to be able to take the lake with them. (Some > of you may remember the woman. She's my favorite ex-model, Amy.) > Paul > On Dec 2, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Bob Shell wrote: > >> >> On Dec 2, 2006, at 7:03 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: >> >>>> That's what I'm thinking. I'll try printing tomorrow. It will >>>> probably >>>> take four or five hours to make an 87 inch print. >>> >>> Without a third-party RIP, the Epson 2200 won't print longer than 40 >>> inches. (Or at least it isn't *supposed* to.) >> >> That's correct. I talked to some Epson people about this arbitrary >> length limit and they knew of no way to get around it. >> >> Bob >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
