Did you take out the battery without a memory card inside, maybe without having turned the camera off first?
I think the istD behaved in this way: if you took out the batteries it would later look at the card to figure out the next number. If no card was present, it would use whatever it had saved in its internal memory. But if the battery had been taken out without turning the camera off first, then the camera didn't have the chance to write the last number to memory. All this might be wrong, and it might not apply to the K10D, but I'd pay attention to the factors I mention. I haven't seen anything like this in my K10D, but then again, I'm automatically renumbering all images as I upload them to the computer, so I wouldn;t notice if it happened. j On 12/1/06, Peter Loveday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone else had issues with image numbering on their K10D? > > Twice now, I've had it go back a few in count, such that I have duplicate > numbered images. > > Its not that it resets to 001... last time it went back to 231 when my most > recent was 240, or somesuch... as if it fails to write the new count to > nvram internally, or something. In any case, its irritating to have to deal > with not overwriting images. > > I have it set to "Date" for Folder Name, and "File No." in Memory is turned > on. > > - Peter > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Juan Buhler - http://www.jbuhler.com photoblog: http://photoblog.jbuhler.com a book: http://www.jbuhler.com/book.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
