One can stuff more circuitry in them. Including more flash memory. -Adam
Tom C wrote: > Hmmm.... I had thought that CF II always meant microdrive. What would be > the reasoning for making a non micro-drive CF II device? > > > > Tom C. > > > > > >>From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>Subject: Re: Somewhat OT - Compact Flash type II >>Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:49:17 -0500 >> >>On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:04:41PM -0700, Tom C wrote: >> >>>Hitachi 4GB and 2-IBM 1GB's. I agree, if the Seagate, has problems... >>> >>>I see at Tiger Direct they have Transcend 4GB Flash Type I for around >> >>$80. >> >>>They have Crucial (Lexar) 4GB Type I for $78 and 2GB for $38. >>> >>>I would definitely by a Type I if the price is the same. >>> >>>Tom C. >> >>Tom - you appear to be confusing CF type (based on physical dimensions) >>with the underlying media type. >> >>All microdrives are CF II, but not all CF II devices are microdrives. >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
