That's a very big difference. The Pentax 18-55 is a step up from the other kits, the 16-45 is far superior to them in resolving power. The Sony 18-70 is particularly bad.
-Adam Dario Bonazza wrote: > Yes, I forgot to mention that, while I pointed out the same thought on > Italian forum, just prior to do the same here, > My fault. > > Dario > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 11:53 AM > Subject: Re: K10D image quality > > >> But we forgot one thing K10D in thi scomparison used DA 16-45/4 - >> hardly cheap, "kit" lens, while others used the cheapest standard >> lenses. >> >> On 01.12.2006, at 11:38 , Rob Brigham wrote: >> >>> Thanks for that Dario - I have only had a look at the K10D/EOS400D >>> shots >>> so far but there is a big difference in favour of the Pentax as you >>> say! >> Cheers, >> Sylwek >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
