Kenneth Waller wrote:
>>I would suggest that you link to a thumbnail >>so folks who are still living in the computer stone age do not get stuck >>trying to download an image that takes 15 minutes. >> >> > >Also - FWIW - there really is no reason to post images bigger than 100/150 >kb > >Kenneth Waller > > Well I"m out of the dark age computer thing now - but I'm happiest with my screen set at - hmm what is it 1084 x whatever ... and given lnavigaton bars and such, even though I can download things faster I'd have to scroll to see all of anything much bigger than 800 x 600. ann >----- Original Message ----- >From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: Display size? > > > > >>If you do something bigger, I would suggest that you link to a thumbnail >>so folks who are still living in the computer stone age do not get stuck >>trying to download an image that takes 15 minutes. If they want to see >>the full size image they can then click on the thumbnail. In my opinion >>that would be simple Internet courtesy. >> >>--graywolf >> >> >> >>cbwaters wrote: >> >> >>>What pixel size is good for PESOs? >>>I usually try to stay around 800x600 so as not to offend the monitorally >>>challenged. >>>But my last Peso looked a little puny at that size.... >>>So: >>>http://bellsouthpwp.net/c/b/cbwaters/photo/fire-wood.jpg >>> >>>Or: >>>http://bellsouthpwp.net/c/b/cbwaters/photo/fire-wood-bigger.jpg >>> >>>or bigger? >>> >>> >>>CW >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
