Hello John,

Certainly the A and earlier zooms have the problem of not transmitting
the focal length in use.  When I briefly tested my Sigma 100-300/4 EX,
the EXIF did indicate the correct focal length of the images I shot,
so I'm guessing it would properly transmit for the SR.  But the age of
the lens could have some impact for earlier 3rd party lenses.

-- 
Bruce


Saturday, November 25, 2006, 3:21:57 AM, you wrote:

>> I personally would not buy a pre-AF zoom lens again, however,  
>> particularly for the K100D or K10D bodies, as without the focal  
>> length information transmitted from lens to body, obtaining benefit
>> from the antishake technology is a bit more of a pain than I would 
>> be  interested in. It's ok to set a focal length for a prime, a pain
>> when  the point of using a zoom is convenience in rapidly changing
>> circumstances.

JW> That never occurred to me until you mentioned it, that could have some
JW> serious consequences. I'm not to bothered by the M & A zooms, I only have
JW> four M 24-35, M 35-70, A 35-105 and A 70-210. But if the Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX
JW> doesn't communicate the correct information it's going to be a right PITA,
JW> same goes for the Tamron 28-75 XR Di to a lesser extent. I'd be left with FA
JW> 28-105 power zoom and FA 80-320 zoom. What about using rear converters? Like
JW> the F 1.7x and the Sigma EX converters.

JW> John

JW> John Whittingham


JW> ---------- Original Message -----------
JW> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JW> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
JW> Sent: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:08:41 -0800
JW> Subject: Re: AW: Reservations about DA 16-45

>> I don't use zooms very much, but I have had excellent results with
>> the FA28-105/3.2-4.5 AL IF, the F100-200/4.5-5.6, the A70-210/4  
>> Macro, the A35-70/4, the F35-70/3.5-4.5 Macro and the FA20-35/4 AL.
>> That last is my favorite zoom lens of all, and I use it a lot  
>> (relatively speaking).
>> 
>> I don't buy much third party glass.
>> 
>> I personally would not buy a pre-AF zoom lens again, however,  
>> particularly for the K100D or K10D bodies, as without the focal  
>> length information transmitted from lens to body, obtaining benefit
>> from the antishake technology is a bit more of a pain than I would 
>> be  interested in. It's ok to set a focal length for a prime, a pain
>> when  the point of using a zoom is convenience in rapidly changing
JW> circumstances.
>> 
>> Godfrey
>> 
>> On Nov 23, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Markus Maurer wrote:
>> 
>> > makes me wonder what Pentax M or A or third party zoom gives the best
>> > results on a digital body?
>> > Has anybody tested the Pentax A35-70mm F4 or Pentax A 28-135mm F 4  or
>> > M75-150 for example?
>> > greetings
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
JW> ------------------------
>> 
>> The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom
>> it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
>> material. If you have received an email in error please notify 
>> Carmel College on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it 
>> from your systems.
>> 
>> Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email
>> attachments for viruses we cannot guarantee a communication to be 
>> free of all viruses nor accept any responsibility for viruses.
>> 
>> Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for 
>> inappropriate content, the college cannot be held responsible for 
>> the views or expressions of the author. The views expressed may not
>> necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel College cannot be held
>> responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
JW> ------------------------
JW> ------- End of Original Message -------


JW> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JW> The information transmitted is intended only for the person
JW> to whom it is addressed and may contain
JW> confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received
JW> an email in error please notify Carmel College
JW> on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

JW> Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails
JW> and email attachments for viruses we cannot
JW> guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor
JW> accept any responsibility for viruses.

JW> Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails
JW> for inappropriate content, the college cannot
JW> be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
JW> The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel
JW> College and Carmel College cannot be held
JW> responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.

JW> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to