Hi Doug, Why not updating the PDML signature like I'm suggesting below? That way we could rest assured that any message will be worth something. Unless you'll do that, I'm afraid that a small percentage of messages won't deal with that issue. That's frightening me!
Thanks, Dario Current (useless): PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net New, improved: "Pentax should bring back the aperture simulator" JCO Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thesimulator.net/JCOmailman/pay50bucks/whattheheck.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
