Thats not the issue, the issue is would you rather have full support of K/M for the very low cost it would add to the camera or not? THAT is what I am talking about.
Your so called argument makes no sense. Its like saying no need for IS, because tripods exist, or no need for a meter at all because you could take pictures using an external hand held meter. These are good camera FEATURES, not just the ability to get a photograph or not if you work around the lack of the features. jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 1:30 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pentax 1.8 85mm Read between the lines ... John, why do you insist on continuing this stupidity. We all know your position on this, and for those of us who buy and use Pentax DSLR's, we have either accepted the reality of the situation or just don't care. I love my K-mount lenses, and I'm glad to be able to easily use them on the DSLR. Shel J. C. O'Connell wrote: > > A "HAR!" does not answer the question. Would you > pay $50 more for full K/M support on a top line > Pentax DSLR or not? I W O U L D ! If I only had ONE > really good K/M lens it would be well worth it to me..... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
