On 24/11/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've found that the K10D DNG files require only about half as much > sharpening as my *istD files. That has to be a good thing. I don't > know if it's a result of the higher resolution or better in-camera > control, but I'm pleased.
It's due to the higher cut-off frequency for the anti-aliasing filter I expect. The *ist D was a very well designed camera in that respect, it had just the right amount of AA to virtually eliminate HF aliasing but provide good data for sharpening. -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
