Scott Loveless wrote: >Take a look here: http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/supporters.html >and here: http://www.barry.pearson.name/articles/dng/products_y1.htm
Yes, lots of software supports DNG. But Adobe has no way of insuring they do it *well* or of forcing them to offer complete support. Anyone who implements DNG conversion in their software is perfectly free to limit or cripple it in any way they choose. (Deliberately or accidentally.) For example, Apple's Aperture will only convert DNG files from cameras for which it supports that camera's native RAW format. Apple's rationale is that they don't want to have people doing conversions from cameras for which Aperture has no profile. (Sounds bizarre to me: No conversion at all is preferable to conversion without a profile? I'm guessing they'll pay for dumb decisions like this when beta testing ends and the Aperture vs. Lightroom war starts in earnest.) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
