That reassuring, thanks!

Jack
--- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm also extremely satisfied with my 16-45. It was easily worth the
> cost and is the best zoom I've ever owned. 
> 
> -Adam
> 
> 
> Jack Davis wrote:
> > Paul, glad to read your 16~45 remarks. I just ordered the lens and
> will
> > (happily) deal with the $100 Rebate process.
> > When I receive the lens, I plan to do some comparing with my A-20mm
> > f/2.8. If I'm satisfied with the 16~45 performance, I'll likely
> eBay
> > the 20mm.
> > 
> > Jack
> > 
> > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>I'm very fond of this lens. It's among my most used. Here's a pic I
> >>posted just the other day. It's at f4.5 and 16mm. Plenty of flare
> >>potential here, but the lens handled it well.
> >>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5222820&size=lg
> >>Paul
> >> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> >>From: "John Whittingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>>I've been looking at buying a lens for the K10D in the region of
> 14
> >>
> >>or 16mm, 
> >>
> >>>a good zoom preferably. Despite it's age I'm considering the DA
> >>
> >>16-45 mainly 
> >>
> >>>due to coverage and relatively low price. There seems to be some
> >>
> >>quite 
> >>
> >>>conflicting opinions regarding CA, distortion etc. 
> >>>
> >>>Is there anything I really need to look out for? 
> >>>Is there a high degree of sample variation?
> >>>
> >>>I can't seem to find a published lens test anywhere, no surprises
> >>
> >>there, 
> >>
> >>>everyone seems to test the latest C****n or N***n hardware,
> >>
> >>although I'm 
> >>
> >>>sure that's all about to change for the better ;-)
> >>>
> >>>Finally would anyone like to sell their 16-45?
> >>>
> >>>Regards,
> >>>
> >>>John
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> >>>--------------------
> >>>
> >>>The information transmitted is intended only for the person to
> whom
> >>
> >>it is 
> >>
> >>>addressed and may contain
> >>>confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an
> >>
> >>email in error 
> >>
> >>>please notify Carmel College
> >>>on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your
> >>
> >>systems.
> >>
> >>>Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and
> >>
> >>email attachments 
> >>
> >>>for viruses we cannot
> >>>guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any
> 
> >>>responsibility for viruses.
> >>>
> >>>Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for
> >>
> >>inappropriate 
> >>
> >>>content, the college cannot
> >>>be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
> >>>The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College
> >>
> >>and Carmel 
> >>
> >>>College cannot be held
> >>>responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of
> a
> >>
> >>message.
> >>
> >>>
> >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> >>>--------------------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>-- 
> >>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>[email protected]
> >>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>[email protected]
> >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Sponsored Link
> > 
> > Compare mortgage rates for today. 
> > Get up to 5 free quotes. www2.nextag.com
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sponsored Link

Rates near 39yr lows. $510,000 Loan for $1698/mo. 
Calcuate new payment. www.LowerMyBills.com/lre

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to