Then my taste has to be in my mouth. I think the colours are incredible and the lighting amazing. Of course it isn't "real" but that's what makes it so interesting -- to me. There are paintings on some Vatican walls that have a similar range of colour and intensity. I'll try to find one or two and post them to illustrate what I mean. I think the picture is great.
D Tim Øsleby wrote: > How about "Photography Of Offensive Purpose"? > We should both wash our mouth now, shame on us. > > I was holding back because I didn't want to disrespect the photographer. He > is an *ist user, and a nice guy ;-) > > What struck me, is that there is a thin line between HDR used for a > photographic purpose, and where it is just a bad taste effect. > > > Tim > Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > William Robb > Sent: 15. november 2006 14:56 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: PESO- merge to HDR (OT-Surreal phot) > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tim Øsleby" > Subject: RE: PESO- merge to HDR (OT-Surreal phot) > > > >> BTW. I just saw an interesting, but terrible IMO, semi HDR picture. >> http://www.photosight.org/photo.php?photoid=44863&ref=author >> The light looks surreal. Kind of funny effect, but tiresome to the >> eye. >> >> There is a thumb below to the original. I'd like to hear some opinions >> on >> this. >> > > Fred Picker would have called it a > "Computer ReAdjusted Picture". > > William Robb > > > > -- Dr E D F Williams www.kolumbus.fi/mimosa/ http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/ 41660 TOIVAKKA – Finland - +358400706616 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
