<LOL> I refrained from commenting on that comment ... but at least Paul will agree to disagree ;-))
The reality is that not everyone has the same needs and skills, and what works well for one person may not work well for the next. Making such generalized statements really serves little purpose, IMO. Shel > [Original Message] > From: mike wilson > > From: Paul Stenquist > > Scanning negatives is much more time consuming and much more > > difficult than processing digital files. All this is a non-starter > > for me, digital has been a foregone conclusion for quite some time. > > There is no debate. One day soon there may well be no film. > > That's your perception. Now look at the person > who shot a roll of film, took it wherever and came > out an hour later (having done something else in > the meantime) with a handful of 6x4s, a proportion > of which they would throw away. Will they want > to sit in front of a computer sorting stuff out to get > their prints? Don't think so. > > It works for you but it doesn't work very well for me > and it works very badly for some people - I suggest > that they are the majority of camera users. > > "There is no debate"? You been drinking out of someone > else's cup? 8-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
