No, facts are facts sometimes and truth of the matter is all I am arguing in some cases. It's not always just opinions... jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 11:23 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list? Unfortunately, truth is often a matter of opinion. And sometimes grownups and gentlemen have to agree to disagree. Paul On Nov 12, 2006, at 10:59 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > Its not a matter of "winning" an argument, its > a metter of standing up for right and wrong > or true and false. Im not posting to "win", > Im posting to set the truth on the matter(s). > This list isnt a place for contests. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > Paul Stenquist > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 1:15 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list? > > > I don't think anyone has to go so far as to filter the threads, > although to each their own. I've never filtered anyone, and I'm none > the worse for the experience. But it think we all know that there's a > point where it doesn't make sense to continue with posts addressed > directly to anyone who feels they have to win an argument. I've been > guilty of it with several people here over the years, but it's just > unproductive. > Paul > On Nov 12, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > >> You're probably right, but all I was trying to do was add a little >> levity >> to the situation. Perhaps in another case the lightness of my post >> would >> have been seen and appreciated. And that, my friend, is another >> aspect of >> having discussions with JCO - there's no way to use levity or humor. >> >> It's probably best for all involved that I just filter every thread >> that >> involves JCO ... I'm sure it'll be my loss, but there are other >> sources of >> valuable information available here and on the 'net. >> >> Shel >> >> >> >>> [Original Message] >>> From: Paul Stenquist >> >>> I'm sorry, but this is unnecessary provocation. >>> >>> On Nov 11, 2006, at 11:11 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: >>> >>>> <ROTFLMAO> What kind of convoluted double-speak is that?! >>>> >>>> Shel >>>> >>>> >>>> JCO wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am saying your wrong in the concept >>>>> of that reply post of yours. Someone >>>>> may think they just disagree but if their concept >>>>> is invalid to my contention than thats another >>>>> matter altogether and I won't just "let it drop" >>>>> because it implies that your post is somehow >>>>> a valid rebuttal/opinion when its not if it is >>>>> irrelavant to my contention. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
