Well, I was merely asking the question ;-). I used to want to buy these f/1.8 Sigma wide lenses, but I realized they were too heavy and too big for me. I think that size/speed ratio of limited lenses is just about right, although I find 31/1.8 slightly big to my taste. Though of course it is a wonderful lens.
My recent acquisition - Tamron 28-75/2.8 is probably the largest/heaviest I would ever go. Lovely lens it is by the way. On 11/12/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Boris Liberman wrote: > > >Fastest I think is Sigma 20/1.8. Question is - is it wide enough for > Shel? > > I don't know about wide enough but it certainly ought to be *big* > enough! I actually considered one of those until I did the math and > worked out what it would cost me for an 82mm circular polarizer and a > couple of other filters I use fairly often :) > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
