Thats right get rid of the person who doesnt stand for unprovoked personal attacks instead of the person who commits them. Makes a lot of sense. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 2:41 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: list abuse You might be right. Although JCO only seems to lose it when someone engages him specifically in a continuing debate. Paul On Nov 11, 2006, at 12:47 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > I disagree, Paul. A list owner's responsibility is to manage the list, > deal with technical issues of subscription and communications, and > deal with problem subscribers. JCO can go off and dominate the list > traffic on almost any topic. It creates bad will and a poor image for > the mailiing list, and for Pentax by association. > > Remember that the mailing list is archived and available anonymously > to the public. Do you really think it a good thing that a bazillion > messages full of such nasty dialog/diatribe is published associated > with your name, Pentax' name, etc? > > G > > > On Nov 11, 2006, at 9:21 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> Alll that's really necessary is that the rest of us ignore JCO's >> posts. He's obviously not well, yet people continue to push his >> buttons and incite him. The problem is easily solved. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
