Hey, All I was commenting on was Frank's ambiguous post... Paul Stenquist wrote: > Leica, of course. They've been teetering on the edge for quite some > time. An M8 failure could be the grand finale. > Paul > On Nov 10, 2006, at 6:11 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: > > >>> No wonder they're on the edge of bankruptcy... >>> >> Epson or Leica? >> >> frank theriault wrote: >> >>> On 11/10/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Don't forget the banding issue <LOL> >>>> >>>> I can understand Frank's comments, although he may have been very >>>> strong in >>>> his wording to make his point. But I agree - Leica should have >>>> been able >>>> to produce better results the first time around, but they may >>>> have been >>>> under pressure to release the camera with less than adequate >>>> testing. >>>> Still, they've had years to work on this. At one point Leica >>>> even said >>>> that a digital rangefinder was not even possible, but then the >>>> Epson came >>>> out - a few years ago. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Well, yeah, like I said, hyperbole to make my point... <LOL> >>> >>> But, as you said, Epson managed to do it a couple of years ago, and I >>> don't know that they had problems with fringing or banding or >>> whatever, and it cost a hell of a lot less. >>> >>> No wonder they're on the edge of bankruptcy... >>> >>> cheers, >>> frank >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > >
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
