Hello Shel,

Thanks for the comments.  I did try shooting closer, but the intent of
the shot was more to show the brown, dried portions along with the
greener ones, showing the importance of the rain - or at least the
effects of no rain.  Going in tighter is much like cropper tighter in
a street scene that loses the context.

See my post to Bill Robb about DOF frustrations I have with macro.

-- 
Bruce


Saturday, November 4, 2006, 8:58:31 AM, you wrote:

SB> Hi Bruce ....

SB> The rain has been nice, hasn't it.  Down here it was a warm rain which gave
SB> the air a nice, clean, refreshing smell and washed the dust off the leaves.
SB> I went out for a walk around 3:00am, and the early morning smells and
SB> reflections of the lights from the trees, shrubbery, and buildings and
SB> pavement was just lovely.

SB> I find this photo a bit cliché and somewhat at odds with itself.  The
SB> leaves and area surrounding the central area of the photo could, I think,
SB> benefit from being sharper, if not front and back, than at least front or
SB> back.  To my eye there's too much information.  Getting closer to the drops
SB> and eliminating some of the surrounding area may give more strength to the
SB> image.

SB> Perhaps carrying a small tripod that can fit in your camera bag will allow
SB> you to make such shots with greater DOF, or even less DOF where appropriate.

SB> That Tamron is supposed to be a pretty good lens, isn't it?

SB> Shel



>> [Original Message]
>> From: Bruce Dayton 

>> Right after the first rain of the season.
>> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3846.htm
>>
>> Comments welcome






-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to