Hi, Yes, I did mentioned the operation speed as a poor thing. But I personally prefer slower, but more accurate operation in focussing etc. A20 offers enough accuracy. And it's not THAT slow after all :)
BR, Margus Jaume Lahuerta wrote: >So, they didn't address the A10 poor (slow) performance issue? >Shouldn't be that difficult... > > >----- Mensaje original ---- >De: Margus Männik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >Hi, > >I reviewed A20 for our local photo/computer magazine last month. It was >a sort of head-to-head test versus Olympus mju: 750. Pentax wins hands >down. >What's about A20... it's a bit slow in operation, but image results are >very good. Good noise, which is easily repairable with post-processing >software ( I do use NeatImage). But if you can find Optio A10 somewhere >on good (i.e. significally lower) price - go for A10. You will not get a >better resolution with A20. > >BR, Margus > > >Leon Altoff wrote: > > > >>Hello all, >> >>I am currently looking at compact point and shoot digitals. >>Specifically I am looking for one that can do movie clips in macro mode >>(or even super macro mode if it has it). >> >>It will also be used as a camera by my wife who has decided that she no >>longer wants to carry around an SLR. >> >>Of course I am looking at the Pentax range (as well as others), and was >>considering the Optio A20. does anyone out there have one of these and >>can tell me if it is possible to take movies in macro mode? Does anyone >>have any other suggestions for good compact point and shoot cameras? >> >>All replies appreciated. >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
