Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > On Oct 26, 2006, at 12:24 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > > >>... I don't trust Sigma flashes, given my experiences with the Nikon >>versions and their Not Actually i-TTL NA-iTTL protocol. > > > I'm with you there ... I don't trust Sigma anything, really, but the > EF500DG Super is the only other game in town for P-TTL just at the > moment, although I seem to recall a Promaster that might be compatible. > > If/when I want a dedicated flash, I'll go with the Pentax or, if Metz > has done a P-TTL module, a Metz. So far I haven't seen the need: the > Sunpak 383 works fine. > > Godfrey >
Same here, my SB-24 does an excellent job in Auto mode. I'll go for a P-TTL flash for the wireless features, and having used (briefly) a Sigma EF500DG Super NA-iTTL unit, I hesitate to even try wireless flash with the P-TTL version. -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
