I just can't believe that people would take the hearsay about "stated reason for the delay" seriously. Joe comments as if Pentax were lying to him personally, and poses a note which seems to indicate that we should all be shocked and horrified from some lofty position of moral superiority.
It's all hot air. If the camera is late to arrive, it's late. Big deal for some, I guess, mostly for Pentax. Why bother about what caused the delay other than to just blow more hot air around? What does it really matter? Godfrey On Oct 26, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Tom C wrote: > They call that spin now Joe. Or possibly a simple > miscommunication. ;-) > >> If this post is correct, it confirms what some of us suspected: >> Pentax's >> stated reason for the delay was a fabrication: >> >> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp? >> forum=1036&message=20624601 >> >> I don't mind that Pentax delayed the camera to get it right. I do >> mind >> being lied to. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
