Doesnt leica M have much better long term system support? You guys act like 1983 is ancient history. What are you all, A bunch of teenage rookies? jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Roberts Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 9:40 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The JCO survey
Pål Jensen wrote: >If it cost $5 and you sell a million cameras thats five million. >I personally believe that the lens mount without mechanical coupling are >more suited for robotic assembly. Mechanical linkages needs precision and is >probably far more expensive to manufacture I suspect. Therefore I don't >think we will see a completely compatible lens mount in anything but a >top-of-the-line body if at all. >Personally, I find this issue trivial. Although it would have been nice with >complete comaptibility with K and M lenses, Pentax after all fully support >all lenses made after 1983. Thats best in business. That's all well and good Pål, but your rational arguments aren't going to have any effect on what is essentially an emotional reaction. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
