I doubt that Pentax has regressed. BTW, I think Doug was being facetious. It's probably not time to get nostalgic about the *istD.
On Oct 17, 2006, at 9:42 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > On 18/10/06, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Well, that's it. The camera is useless. > > That was one great thing about the *ist D, the AA filter seemed very > well matched to the sensor which meant that images sharpened well and > rarely suffered aliasing problems, though it didn't measure up as well > regarding resolution as some of the other cameras built around the > same sensor. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
