I only got the 75mm because it happened to be the shift lens which I got for a song (at the time). I've never used the standard 75's so I can't comment on those, but the shift is great if not slow in use, but it is far from my favorite focal length. The 55mm is better (think ~28mm in 35mm format), but like Mr. Robb, I think I would prefer the 45mm (that's the next one for me).
The 90mm is fine but limited because it's a "standard" lens. It's easier to focus than slower lenses (at least w/the 67II) and it is one of the faster lenses for the 67. --- J and K Messervy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To get myself started with a 67 lens, I'm torn > between a 90 f2.8 that I can > pick up for approx $110USD or a 75 f4.5 that will > cost more like $200 USD > once shipped. I know that the 75 is wider, but I'll > still end up getting a > 55 as soon as I can afford it. > > Should I just get the cheaper (and faster) lens to > start with and have more > money in my pocket for something else or should I > bite the bullet and get > the wider 75mm? Incidentally, I don't think the 75 > is really wide enough > for the kind of landscapes I have in mind anyway. > > Decisions..... > > James > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
