I've recently been playing around with a new (to me) sharpening
technique, which is 100% non destructive & may be worth a try.

You make your adjustments, levels curves etc. as you normally would.

When it comes time to do the sharpening create a copy of the
background layer & run the high pass filter (filter>other>high pass),
with the radius set from between 1.3-2.5 pixels depending on the image
size & content. Everything goes grey but that's normal.

Now, do your sharpening to this background copy layer (USM or smart
sharpen, whichever you prefer). I deliberately over sharpen at this
stage.

Now set the sharpened background copy layer blending mode to "soft light".

>From here you can fine tune the sharpening by either adjusting the
layer opacity and leaving it at that or, for a little more control,
add a layer mask and paint over the areas that need to be brought
down.

I find it works great most of the time.

Dave.

PS. Nice picture, but I too find the foreground leaves look a little "odd".

On 10/18/06, Jostein Øksne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for all the comments, folks. Much appreciated.
>
> Re: sharpening, I agree that it looks a bit odd. I went back and
> checked the raw file again, and reduced sharpness adjustment to
> minimum. This produced a very soft image indeed, but the bright spots
> among the leaves were still there. Some leaves are much brighter than
> the others, and produce specular highlights. Some of the trees are
> aspens which have a waxy leaf surface... that could be one culprit, I
> think. There are also goat willows in there, with leaves that are
> covered with white hairs underneath. With a whiff of wind they could
> cause trouble too. Btw, the specular highlight in the background is
> caused by sunlight reflection off a barn roof.
>
> Hmm. Too bad. I almost felt I liked the shot...:-)
>
> Cheers,
> Jostein
> Hooom booom barooom....
>
> On 10/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In a message dated 10/17/2006 1:41:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > The trees in the foreground look a bit oversharpened
> > though, lots of specular highlights jumping at you ...
> >
> > Regards, JvW
> > =========
> > Very pretty. But I agree, the leaves in the foreground look oversharpened.
> > And that is a comment I do not make often. Because the background is hazy, 
> > the
> > leaves jump out too much. It would be easy to tone down, then you'd have a
> > great shot.
> >
> > Just my .02.
> >
> > Marnie aka Doe :-)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to