> I'm thinking of a kit with the 18-125 as a general use lens, FA50/f1.4 
> for portraits and low light and Sigma 105/f2.8 EX macro for close up and 
> quality longer shots.  Any opinions?

Most pictures at the site below taken with the 18-125:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/keith.mcguinness/ph/peso/index.html
(The seagull, pelican, flower and tanks were NOT taken with the 
18-125.)

I think it's okay BUT I haven't used a lot of different lens so 
don't have the experience to offer a strong opinion.

I DO that photos taken with it lack a bit of resolution, compared 
to photos taken with my Pentax SMC-A lenses.

Some of that may be due to focus problems. I've read reports that 
it doesn't always focus correctly and that is also my impression.

Don't get me wrong. The 18-125 sits on my camera most of the time 
as my "general purpose" lens because it is light and the 18-125 
range is very handy for the type of photography that I do.

On the other hand, when I want the best quality I can possibly 
get, I usually switch to one of my SMC-A lenses, which I think 
give sharper, brighter images.

Keith McG

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to