On 16/10/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It occurred to me earlier that the big engine in a mini is, in some > ways, a false analogy. On the other hand, it could be considered an > extremely apt analogy. Because the uitilization of more horsepower > than one needs depends entirely on the supporting technology. With a > multi-disc clutch that applies in stages, seventeen inch wide slicks > and damped wheely bars, the 1000 horsepower or so could easily be put > to the ground in a mini. Similarly, the utilization of more advanced > electronics is dependent on the supporting hardware. Now I realize > that Rob believes that sensor characteristics are a stopper, but I'm > not sure his point of view is shared by all.
I should have said with otherwise standard running gear :-) WRT the K10D, I arrive at my conclusion if I apply the basic principles of signal gain analysis, that's an advantage I have in the discussion I guess. -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
