Don't blame us, it all Wheatfield Willie's fault.
Scott Loveless wrote:
>On 10/14/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>But if they go for Pentax now, seeing it as "good value for money" why
>>>won't they go for something else when they have money for "quality"?
>>>
>>>
>>Good question. And the best answer is to point out that *I'm* an
>>example of it! A large part of the cause for my spending $1400.00 on a
>>Pentax DSLR (that's what I paid when I bought the ist-D when it was a
>>hot item) was that I had bought a K-1000 when I was a kid and that was
>>all I could afford. I've since spent thousands more on Limited lenses
>>and such.
>>I bet a majority of people on this list who've been shooting Pentax for
>>a long time have a similar story.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Yup. My first SLR was my Dad's K1000. A few years back I bought a
>28mm and a 200mm lens and was quite satisfied. Then I started
>wondering if other cameras offered something I might like, so I bought
>an AE-1 with a 50/1.2 and a motor drive. A couple months later, not
>being all that impressed with it, I gave it to a young lady who was
>interested in photography but had little money and no camera. Then I
>joined the list. Now I own 5 Pentax 35mm SLR bodies, over a dozen
>lenses, a point and shoot digital, and just recently bought the wife a
>K100D. I hate all of you and your enablement. ;)
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
