You are an asshole. You cannot be serious if you think What canon did was worse because it wasn't. Not supporting Lenses by removing a $5 part is far far worse than anything Canon has ever done. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 2:16 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The JCO survey ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: The JCO survey > Its unethical to disable legacy products without > Good cause and there isnt anything cost or technically > Or new improvements causing it. You cant say its better for them to > Screw prior customers to sell new lenses they wouldn't > Need if they supported them fully. I wont condone it. > I would rather switch brands then do that. Canon is >>From what I can see the best brand to start from scratch with. > And if you have to buy new lenses just for this disabling camera, > Then you are essentially starting from scratch arent you? We'll just conveniently forget that Canon did a much more henious thing to their legacy products customers when we buy from a company whose actions we don't condone, right? William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
